Too bad Big Tech is too fucked up to responsibly guide in technocracy

There are “news” headlines today about posts from world leaders being deleted from social media due to false information about Covid-19. This gives some cause for reflection: If some statements, actions, or decisions of leaders are deemed incorrect, unhealthy, or unwholesome with respect to Covid-19, what about other statements, actions, and decisions?

If certain things can be blocked due to errors, why not simply block all erroneous, false, incorrect, and/or dangerous actions, statements, and decisions of leaders? I mean, why stop with Covid-19?

We have the capacity to process extremely complex, diverse, and expansive information to arrive at insights, make decisions, and create logistical processes. In some areas – for example consumer behavior – this is done routinely at advanced levels all the time. So why isn’t this being done with respect to the even more important and critical areas of government planning and policy? And one wonders if we aren’t going to see a push for this more and more as time goes on. It seems logical if not inevitable.

This would perhaps be a good idea if Big Tech wasn’t completely fucked up and completely incapable of being trusted.

But as it stands, these companies are fucking evil. They want to destroy the United States and they are actively fucking over millions of native U.S. citizens. They are flooding the U.S. with millions of pajeets. They are promoting race-mixing. They are openly partisan, and openly pushing a radical, globohomo agenda and insane policies of “equality” that cause destruction and single out whites in particular.

Companies like Google, Apple, Microsoft, Facebook, Twitter, and others are the absolute last entities that would ever be capable of responsibly ushering in the application of technology for the sake of benefiting society. All one has to do is look at the conduct of these companies for it to be immediately clear that any of them having anything remotely to do with policy or governance of society would be a complete disaster.

Society will be healthy when it moves beyond these companies. Nothing these companies create is essential – and I mean this specifically in technical, not general terms. None of the products and services these companies create are essential nor necessary. All of them can and should be replaced by the healthier model of open-source software and technology.

In fact there already exist healthy alternatives for much of what these evil companies do. And these alternatives are vastly better in terms of their impact on society. For example, one does not see the open-source office suite project LibreOffice constantly clamoring for and bribing the government for infinite pajeet invasion. The same goes for open-source Linux distros which can and should have replaced Microsoft Windows and Apple OSX years if not decades ago.

It’s appalling how these same sick companies with their fucked-up, clusterfuck-tier societal-damaging activities are still existing and conducting business in this time, instead of healthier and more wholesome alternatives replacing them completely.

Politicians – especially policymakers who make decisions about immigration – need to wake the fuck up on this issue and not allow themselves to be beguiled by these fucked-up, evil, and wholly unnecessary Big Tech companies and realize that open-source technology is the way of the future.

And don’t let companies like Microsoft and Google fool you. Even though they spend money on open-source, to them it is only an angle for raking in income and gaining control. Yes a company like Microsoft can easily slap down tens of millions of dollars to acquire a company like Github, but for them this is about control and domination. The most healthy thing Microsoft could do is to open-source all of its products and disband itself as a company. The same is true for all these companies.

These companies are cancers. They are causing clusterfuck-tier societal damage through their continued existence and operation. All government policy should be to avoid and diminish anything to do with them whatsoever.


Comments

Leave a Reply