The Most Interfered with Election in the History of the United States

Citizens of the United States have a fundamental right to the integrity of their elections. That is the basic question.

The next question is: To what extent is the Trump administration and the Supreme Court going to defend and uphold that integrity.

The November 3rd, 2020 election in the United States was the most interfered with election in the United States. That interference came in the following forms:

1. Extreme, concerted, unrelenting severe main stream media bias against President Trump and in favor of Biden.

2. Extreme, concerted, unrelenting interference by Big Tech. This comes in the forms of censoring or demoting content favorable to Trump and harmful to Biden and in promoting content harmful to Trump and favorable to Biden.

3. Election interference, tampering, and fraud in the form of activities like ballot harvesting, partisan projects intended to “fix” ballots (i.e. ballot stuffing), encouragement of non-citizens to vote (there are tens of millions of non-citizens across the United States), and other activities designed to chisel away at the integrity of elections and slant the election in favor of Biden.

What we need are clear Supreme Court rulings invalidating elections that are unfair and invalid. The citizens of the United States have a right to the integrity of their elections and elections that take place in a fair, unbiased environment. That clearly has not been the case in this election.

There must also be a criminal investigation into and complete public exposure/disclosure of the Biden family’s financial dealings in foreign countries. Furthermore, the media files from Hunter Biden’s laptop revealing extreme debauchery and illegal drug use must not be censored nor suppressed. Similarly, the multifarious examples that exist on video of Joe Biden fondling and sexually molesting young girls must not be suppressed.

The United States should be ashamed of this election and even more ashamed of the loss of integrity of its media and technology, and of the failing integrity of its election process in an age when the technology exists such that that integrity should be increasing, not decreasing.

This is the 21st century, and we have a right to expect an extremely high degree of integrity in our elections, not lowered standards that allow for fraud and meddling based on false claims about “fairness”, “equality”, or “rights” – terms that have been used extensively by those who are attacking our election system.

The Media’s Broadcast Brutality Against Trump
Tim Graham Posted: Jun 12, 2020 12:01 AM
…
One reason for this arrogance is the absolutely punishing media coverage of Trump. The coronavirus pandemic did what some might have thought was impossible: made Trump coverage even more negative. Rich Noyes of the Media Research Center found that from March 4 (when Joe Biden had basically wrapped up the Democratic nomination) through May 31, Trump coverage on the ABC, CBS and NBC evening newscasts was 94 percent negative. In May, it was 99.5 percent negative, an all-time low.

There were 474 evaluative comments about President Trump during this period, and 445 were negative. By contrast, there were only 85 evaluations of Biden, and 51 were negative (61 percent). They were nine times more negative about Trump.

This sounds a lot like the warp and woof of the 2016 campaign coverage, during which Trump drew the lion’s share of media attention and it was overwhelmingly negative, while Hillary Clinton seemed like an afterthought. Even in the last three months of the campaign, Trump was evaluated four times as much as Clinton.
…

US Election Fraud Is Real—and Its Impact Is Being Ignored

… had won by 905 votes, a margin of only 0.3% of all ballots cast. The state’s Board of Elections refused to certify the results, though, when evidence surfaced of “concerted fraudulent activities related to absentee by-mail ballots,” including illegal vote harvesting by a political consultant and his associates.

The board’s investigation turned up so many cases of fraudulent activity, including forged signatures and widespread ballot harvesting, that a new election was ordered in the congressional race as well as two local races. A new candidate, Dan Bishop, took Harris’ place and went on to win the seat in a special election last year.

A Wake County grand jury, meanwhile, indicted the political consultant on charges of felony obstruction of justice, conspiracy to obstruct justice, possession of absentee ballots, and perjury.

Not all cases of election fraud are this far-reaching, of course. Many are quite small, involving a relative handful of votes. But they are not nearly as rare as many people would like to think.

The fact is, election fraud is real, and as many of the examples in The Heritage Foundation’s Election Fraud Database show, it can change the outcome of an election.

And yet many in the media would rather look the other way. Worse, some try to dismiss or explain away evidence that doesn’t fit the pre-approved “move along, nothing to see here” narrative. They falsely insist that there are no vulnerabilities in the electoral process.