A Couple Esoteric (or not?) Points

I want to write these down to remember.

First point: The process of European culture developing advanced technology and eventually developing navigation and ocean-capable sailing vessels was not an act of evil. That means: the sailing to the shores of the North American continent on Earth was not an act of evil, but an act of advancement and discovery. It was inevitable.

The bullshit being proffered that Europeans sailing to North America across the Atlantic was an act of evil, of hostility or subjugation, is false. The Europeans sailing across the Atlantic was inevitable, so that means encountering the people in those lands was inevitable.

When they reached those lands they did not find a country. They found different tribes living in scattered places, often making war amongst themselves. There were attempts at peaceful relations and exchanges of information. Of course it was not perfect. Yes there was conflict. But that is what it was. That doesn’t mean that bad things didn’t occur that shouldn’t have occurred, but those things must be addressed within the specific contexts in which they occurred.

Second point: Was listening to Wednesday’s (yesterday) TDS podcast and Mike was again talking about federal law enforcement ops and the naming of “white supremacy” as the “greatest threat” to the United States.

I think they missed something in the podcast and want to mention it. I think what the FBI and other agencies are probably referring to are shootings like the one in Gilroy and the other one that occurred somewhere in Texas in which a young white person shot a lot of Mexicans.

It is not correct to call those shootings “white supremacist”. In fact, to do so is a deliberate attack against, a blood libel against whites.

From what I know about both those cases, the young men were basically upset at seeing their community turn Mexican. In the course of their lifetime the massive flood of Mexicans in their communities caused major changes and a massive displacement of whites.

Of course I’m not defending violence, but want to clarify that those actions they took were not out of white supremacy. White supremacy is something different.

What is going on here is that federal law enforcement is attempting to use those events to attack any whites who want to resist the mass invasion of the United States.

But the shooters in both cases were basically kids who freaked out at what was happening in their communities. On some level, it is understandable that someone would react when their town is flooded with a large amount of foreigners, especially third-worlders whose culture is alien. It is natural to feel some degree of emotional response to that happening.

But what federal law enforcement is trying to do is to weaponize that against any whites who would want to organize or speak out against mass immigration. That is a form of blood libel, and I think Mike identified that.

People are dismayed at the mass demographic replacement in their communities. Wanting to live in your community among your own people, the same as your parents and grandparents did isn’t white supremacy and the FBI fucking knows that.

Same thing is happening in the UK with Muslims. It’s invasion.
Demographic replacement migration was planned. Who voted for it?
Look at the border policy of that country USA taxpayers fork over $ tens of billions $ to every year.