1. What the fuck do you think is going to happen when fossil fuels run out?
Don’t tell me you don’t think fossil fuels will run out, or that when they do that there will exist any viable alternative to sustain the inexpensive international travel that currently exists.
Even if such an alternative existed, and even if fossil fuels were not to run out, do you think it’s a good idea anyway for so many resources to be expended for travel like this?
That international travel is anything other than unsustainable and unnecessary is a profound delusion
2. What do you think is going to happen when fossil fuels do run out and there’s no more international travel? Do you think the Pastuns in Afghanistan and people living in Guangzhou or Kalamazoo are just going to magically remain similar? That there won’t be extensive differentiation according to physical, cultural, social, and many other traits?
3. You tell us how our not wanting to destroy ourselves and become like others is racist and evil, but do you think the Pashtuns want to become like us? Do you think Mongolians want to become like us? This philosophy, when applied equally to all groups, is blatantly evil and violent.
4. Beyond all of this, you are fucking tools for the oligarchy. With allies like you, who needs enemies?
Bottom line: Everyone on Earth isn’t going to merge into one big global family. It’s not sustainable, it’s not practical, and it’s simply not the way biology functions on Earth. But beyond that, it’s a violation – a fundamental act of violence to try to impose anything like that on people anywhere on Earth.
People have a right to live where they live, to exist sustainably in their homelands, free from invasion and replacement. Anything else is evil.
The landmass of Europe belongs to European peoples and only to European peoples, regardless of their rates of procreation, productivity, gross national product, or anything else. It’s theirs to live in as they want.
The same goes for the landmass of China, Central America, India, Indonesia, etc.
I don’t dislike Indian people, but I don’t want to live in India and I have a right to not have my homeland turn into India, or Mexico, or China.
Breitbart.com: Jet-Powered Hypocrisy: Globalist Elites, Celebrities Leave Massive Carbon Footprints
Hollywood celebrities and business leaders have carbon footprints up to 300 times bigger than the rest of us, a study reveals, highlighting the hypocrisy of those who promote climate change activism while refusing to set foot on a commercial flight.
Rich and famous “super-emitters” are such constant travelers they could also be encouraging others to follow in their slipstream by boasting of their private jet-setting habits on social media, researchers found.
Topping the list of celebrity greenhouse gas super-emitters is Microsoft billionaire Bill Gates, with a whopping carbon footprint of more than 1,600 tons of CO2.
This is built in part on his regular attendance at the annual World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, with other members of the globalist elite.
Irony Alert: A Thousand Private Jets Deliver Globalist Elite to Davos for Climate Change Summit https://t.co/uWJxkxpVoJ
— Breitbart London (@BreitbartLondon) January 24, 2018
Gates took 59 flights in 2017, travelling 213,130 miles, mostly on his private Bombardier BD-700 jet, which he describes as his ‘big splurge’ and which seats 19 passengers.
Second was socialite Paris Hilton, who flew 171,346 miles by various private jets, emitting more than 1,260 tons of CO2 in the process.
Jennifer Lopez flew 139,520 miles, Oprah Winfrey 83,356 miles and Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg 65,888 miles. Others in the list include designer Karl Lagerfeld, German footballer Andre Schurrle, web video producer Felix von der Laden and US businesswoman Meg Whitman.
Fucking gee.
The people who should be the last to decide what the world should be like are always the first. Those who are least qualified are the ones with the most authority.
Isn’t it funny how that works?
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.