A very concise history of the United States of America

America began first as a land where people under religious persecution fled.
Later it became a slave colony.
America existed as both a slave colony and a colony of free people. There were also people under indentured servitude who were not slaves but also not free.
Many or most of its founders were slave-owning globalists.
Globalism today is as rotten and destructive as it was in the 17th century.
Globalists still control most of the world’s economy.
Slavery is wrong and slaves should never have been brought to the Americas.
After the Civil War ended millions of slaves were freed. Ever since that time there have been problems which people have tried to address in various ways.

Freeing slaves was great, but there exist fundamental incompatibilities between the Africans and the Europeans. Many people whose communities were suddenly adversely affected by the mass release of slaves became angry and protested. Most of these people never owned slaves and would not have chosen for it to exist, yet they were forced to watch their communities break down while people in the North celebrated their supposedly great achievement.

Perhaps it would have been inconceivable at the time that the slaves were freed to have for example deported them all back to Africa, but the reality is that these two groups of people – the Africans and the Europeans – were incompatible and there has been friction between them ever since. That friction has never really honestly been addressed in a truly objective, honest, scientific manner because it is so political and sensitive.

When we see the constant high levels of crime and other serious problems that have consistently been a part of the African communities, it seems clear that the society created by the Europeans is not compatible with many of them. This is not making a value judgement, but just stating a simple fact. Many Africans are suffering equally or worse than Europeans, and neither group seems happy.

In the Japanese animation film “Spirited Away” there was a character called No Face. No Face was a spirit who was wandering outside the bath house. One day the protagonist of the film – a young girl named Chihiro – thinking she was doing something good lets No Face into the bathhouse. Inside the bathhouse No Face turns into a monster who devours staff members and creates a huge problem.

After causing a lot of destruction eventually Chihiro lures No Face out of the bathhouse. Chihiro’s friend Lin asks Chihiro what she’s doing and Chihiro replies that No Face only needs to be outside of the bathhouse.

This may be a simplification, but the idea is that the No Face spirit was not an evil monster, he was only in the wrong environment, an environment not suitable for him. This is a very Asian view – that there are seldom pure “bad” or “evil” people, but just people with different situations.

So perhaps it would be best to take a realistic look at things and consider whether some Africans are simply not suited for Western societies. For the benefit of the peoples in those societies and for the Africans themselves it may be that, outside of such societies, they are able to live much more fulfilling lives.

You cannot look at a city like Chicago, where there are literally dozens of shootings every week, and think that these people are living fulfilling existences.

Right now all over social media people are screaming about how pro-white people are full of “hate”. Hate hate hate. But white people have a right to stand up for their interests. They have a right to exist, and to continue to exist sustainably. They have a right to build cultural centers of their own which remain their own in perpetuity.

No one would even question this for a country like, say, China. No one would ever accuse Chinese people of being racists, when in fact they are quite racist. No one would accuse people in Indonesia, or Japan, or anywhere else of being racists for wanting their societies to remain they way they were at the time of their grandparents.

All these accusations of hate, hate, hate against white people who want to live peacefully in the country that they, their parents, and their grandparents grew up in is quite frankly outrageous. People who attack whites who are standing up for their own people are in fact anti-white racists.

Someone wrote something recently which struck a chord: Imagine going to somewhere like Tokyo and expecting to experience Japanese culture and finding something completely different – say Icelandic culture. Imagine going to Beijing and expecting to find Chinese culture and finding Mexican culture.

The reality is that if you go to the city of London, you will not find British culture. You will be in Londonistan – a city dominated by Muslims. London is no longer a British city.

Was it virtuous to allow this to occur? Is it virtuous that white people have lost one of their great, historical cities?

The globalists who are destroying white civilization are destroying the very diversity they claim to celebrate. And no one is happy under this.

Globalism and mass immigration is creating an environment of hyper-competition which is a huge crack hit for the economy and for the housing and employment markets. But the end result is that white people find themselves living in societies which are constantly projecting messages that less of them is good, that they are unwanted, and that they should accept their replacement. They are forced to toil endlessly in a world that is alien and cold.

People need to stand up to the mass idiocy and pathological altruism that is enabling this destruction. It is easy to counter the delusion if you see what’s going on clearly. The problem is many do not see clearly. Guilty white people live boring lives in their suburbs and want to feel that they’re doing something, so they get on board with the anti-white train and become pawns for globalists.

The reality is that many, many Africans are cruel and vicious. I have, many times in my life including quite recently, been the subject of such cruelty and viciousness. Such viciousness and cruelty are endemic in African communities. One sees the effect of it in all the killings that are occurring. Yet when entitled white people become indignant about “hate”, is it directed at the people engaging in hatred at an astronomical level? Hell fucking no. Instead they accuse white people of being hateful for wanting to speak out for their own interest. What the fuck is going on?

Basically, it’s easy for these entitled, bleeding heart people to constantly attack whites and accuse them of being hateful, being supremacist, and being Nazis. But they will never criticize the extremely vicious, cruel, and violent Africans, and they expect their fellow citizens to just shut up and bleed.