Witness #3

I walked past a gradeschool playground. On it there were dozens of kids running around and playing. But very, very few where white children. Most were asian and a some were hispanic. The ratio was around 20:1 or 30:1 non-whites to whites.

How sad for these few white children, to be so completely outnumbered. Imagine growing up and living and not knowing what it’s like to be surrounded by your own people.

Where are the cries for diversity? Where is the enormous sense of alarm at the startlingly low number of white children? Had it been any other group in such a minority surely there would be multifarious cries and alarm?

Yet someone may argue: It’s ok to have some places which are not diverse, which are homogeneous. That is about the only possible reasoning that can be given for such a situation.

So I ask: Really??? Is that so?

So it’s ok that there be some places that are not diverse? Really? And why is that?? Who decides where these places are? Please show me the policy where this is established? And if this policy exists, then it must also exist for whites. If other groups deserve to have places where they are dominant and there’s no diversity, then surely whites do also, somewhere?? Where is that place?

Of course it’s all a lie. Because diversity only means less whites and only less whites. If there are almost no or no whites whatsoever, that does not mean not diverse. Only absence of non-whites means not diverse. Diversity is a code word for white genocide.